Washington Post, Page
A23, Saturday, September 10 2005
Commentary;
Best Friends Need Shelter, Too
BYLINE: Karen Dawn runs the animal advocacy
Web site DawnWatch.com and is a contributor to "In Defense of
Animals: The Second Wave," edited by Peter Singer.
The week after Hurricane Katrina hit, the media covered the
thousands of low-income people trapped for lack of means to get out.
Almost two weeks later, thousands still hadn't left, in many cases
because official policy would not accept the bond between people and
their nonhuman family members. Members of a frustrated rescue team
simplified it for a "Dateline" news crew: They said people
were refusing to be evacuated simply because "they won't leave
their pets."
There is a class issue involved here. While Marriott hotels
welcomed the pets of Katrina evacuees as "part of the
family," people who had to rely on the Red Cross for shelter
were forced to abandon that part of the family or attempt to ride
out the storm. It cannot be denied that many poor people are dead as
a result of "no pets" policies.
The Los Angeles Times reported on Patricia Penny, who wondered
whether her son Billy had survived. She had begged him to leave, but
he was afraid to abandon his animals. CNN showed the rescue of a
family, including a dog, sitting on a rooftop as a boat pulled up.
The boat left without the dog. Staying with a dog and risking their
own lives is not an option for people who have children to provide
for. The parents were given no choice but to abandon the dog, and to
break their children's hearts. As they pulled away they all watched
their trusting, confused and terrified canine family member alone on
the roof.
At Red Cross shelters there are families that have lost their
homes and all of their possessions but are thanking God that they
are all safe. Others are frantic, unable to think of anything
besides the slow deaths of beloved companion animals they were
forced to leave on rooftops or at bus boarding points. One woman,
with no other possessions left, offered her rescuer the wedding ring
off her finger to save her dog, to no avail.
A young boy carried a dog in his arms as he tried to board a bus
to the Houston Astrodome. Dogs were not allowed. The Associated
Press story reported that "a police officer took one from a
little boy, who cried until he vomited. 'Snowball, Snowball,' "
he cried." In a similar story, an old woman, traveling alone
except for the poodle in her arms, was forced to leave him behind to
wander the streets. We have read other stories of elderly people
forced to choose between their lifesaving medications or their
life-affirming pets. CNN's Anderson Cooper even reported on a woman,
legally blind, who for 10 days had been told that she could not take
her service dog with her if she was evacuated. She had stayed put
until the CNN cameras arrived and the police relented.
Many large hotel chains, aware of the human-animal bond, now
allow guests of varied species. Sadly, those organizations on which
we rely, not when on vacation but in life-or-death circumstances,
are not up with the times.
The pets pulled from people's arms would not have taken seats
meant for humans. There is no reasonable explanation for abandoning
them. They were the last vestiges of sweetness, in some cases the
only living family, of those who had nothing left. But the police
officers were just following orders -- orders that reflect an
official policy inconsistent with how people feel about their
animals.
Red Cross shelters that do not have animal-friendly areas, or do
not coordinate with humane groups to make sure that there are animal
shelters nearby, are out of touch with the needs of a society in
which 60 percent of families have pets and many view them as
intrinsic members of the family.
Karen Dawn runs the animal advocacy Web site DawnWatch.com and is
a contributor to "In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave,"
edited by Peter Singer.
|